Protocol applies to all primary cardiac tumors.
Procedures
Cytology
This protocol is intended to assist pathologists in
providing clinically useful and relevant information as a result of the
examination of surgical specimens. Use of this protocol is intended to be
entirely voluntary. If equally valid protocols or similar documents are
applicable, the pathologist is, of course, free to follow those authorities.
Indeed, the ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure
must be made by the physician in light of the individual circumstances presented
by a specific patient or specimen.
It should be understood that adherence to this
protocol will not guarantee a successful result. Nevertheless, pathologists are
urged to familiarize themselves with the document. Where a physician chooses to
deviate from the protocol based on the circumstances of a particular patient or
specimen, the physician is advised to make a contemporaneous written notation
of the reason for the procedure followed.
The College recognizes that this document may be
used by hospitals, attorneys, managed care organizations, insurance carriers,
and other payers. However, the document was developed solely as a tool to
assist pathologists in the diagnostic process by providing information that
reflects the state of relevant medical knowledge at the time the protocol was
first published. It was not developed for credentialing, litigation, or
reimbursement purposes. The College cautions that any uses of the protocol for
these purposes involve considerations that are beyond the scope of this document.
I. Cytologic material (pericardial
fluid) back Top Main Page
A. Clinical
Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history
(1) primary cardiovascular disease
(2) myocarditis
(3) congenital heart
(4) history of tumor elsewhere
(5) immunosuppression
(6) tuberous sclerosis
(7) previous irradiation
b. Relevant findings (e.g. ECHO findings,
evidence of tumor elsewhere in body)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure (e.g. fine needle aspiration of
pericardial fluid)
e. Anatomic
site(s) of specimen (e.g. anterior pericardial sac)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Description
b. Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
c. Number of slides received (if appropriate)
d. Quantity, appearance of fluid specimen (if
appropriate)
e. Results of intraprocedural consultation
2. Material submitted for microscopic evaluation
3. Results of rapid smear review
4. Special studies (specify)
C. Microscopic Evaluation
1. Adequacy of specimen (if unsatisfactory for
evaluation, specify reason)
2. Tumor (Note A)
a. Histologic type (if possible)
b. Histologic grade (if possible)
3. Additional pathologic findings, if present
a. Therapy-related changes
b. Degenerative changes
c. Atypical cellular reaction
d. Inflammation
e. Other
4. Status/results of special studies (specify)
5. Comments
a. Correlation with intraprocedural
consultation, as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as
appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
II. Incisional or
excisional biopsy back Top Main Page
A. Clinical Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history
(1) primary cardiovascular disease
(2) myocarditis
(3) congenital heart
(4) history of tumor elsewhere
(5) immunosuppression
(6) tuberous sclerosis
(7) previous irradiation
b. Relevant findings (e.g. ECHO findings,
evidence of tumor elsewhere in body)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure
e. Operative findings
f. Anatomic site(s) of specimen (e.g.
pericardium, left/right ventricle, atrium)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Tissue(s) received
b. Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
c. Number of fragments
d. Dimensions
e. Descriptive features (color/consistency)
f. Orientation (if designated by surgeon)
g. Results of intraoperative consultation
2. Tumor
a. Size (Note B)
b. Descriptive features (e.g. consistency,
color, hemorrhage, necrosis)
c. Extension
3. Margins (if appropriate)
a. Vascular
b. Pericardial
c. Other
4. Tissue submitted for microscopic evaluation
a. Tumor (Note C)
b. Designated areas including those marked
adherent to other structures
c. Margin(s)
d. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless
saved for special studies)
e. Other (specify)
5. Special studies (specify) (e.g. histochem-istry,
immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, morphometry, DNA analysis [specify
type])
C. Microscopic Evaluation
1. Tissue(s) present
2. Tumor
a. Histologic type(s) (Note D)
b. Histologic grade (Note E)
c. Status of designated areas
d. Extent of invasion (adjacent tissues)
3. Margins (as appropriate)
4. Additional pathologic findings, if present
a. Benign tumor
b. Therapy-related changes
c. Degenerative changes
d. Atypical cellular reaction
e. Inflammation
f. Other
5. Results/status of special studies (specify) (Note F)
6. Comments
a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation,
as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as
appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
EXPLANATORY NOTES
A. Cytologic
Findings back Top Main Page
Pericardial effusions are rarely caused by primary
cardiac tumors. The most common causes of
malignant pericardial effusions are metastatic adenocarcinoma from lung or
breast, malignant melanoma, or extension of malignant mesothelioma into the
pericardium. The pathologist should
evaluate the nature and clinical significance of a malignant pericardial
effusion by discussing the findings with the clinician and/or reviewing the
patients medical record. Cellular
changes considered to be infective, reactive, or degenerative (e.g. viral
infection, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiation effect) should be clearly
distinguished from malignant or atypical (potentially malignant) cytologic
findings. Additional patient history
and pertinent clinical findings may be definitive.
The greatest diameter of the tumor in centimeters
should be recorded. There is no published staging system for primary cardiac
tumors.
C. Number of
Sections back Top Main Page
The number of sections varies with the size of the
specimen and the nature of the neoplasm. The pathologist should sample areas
with diverse gross appearances. In addition to tumor evaluation, routine
sampling of the non-neoplastic components of the specimen should be performed.
D. Histologic
Type back Top Main Page
The classification of malignant cardiac tumors as
recommended by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) fascicle on
tumors of the heart and great vessels is listed below.(1) This
protocol, however, does not preclude the use of other histologic
classifications.
AFIP Classification of Malignant Cardiac Tumors
Angiosarcoma
Malignant
fibrous histiocytoma
Myxosarcoma
Fibrosarcoma
Leiomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Osteosarcoma
Synovial
sarcoma
Malignant
schwannoma (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor)
Malignant
mesenchymoma
Malignant
mesothelioma
Other
As with sarcomas in other sites, a variety of
histologic patterns may be found. Although not included in the classification,
lymphomas are also found in the heart.
E. Histologic
Grade back Top Main Page
Pathologists should grade the tumor and indicate the
grading system used. Most malignant tumors of the heart are sarcomas. Necrosis
of groups of cells and mitotic rates of >5 mitoses/ 10 high-power fields
have been associated with reduced survival.(1)
F. Special
Studies back Top Main Page
Immunohistochemistry can be used to ascertain the
histogenesis of a sarcoma or substantiate the diagnosis of mesothelioma.
Generally speaking, mesotheliomas can contain cytokeratins which are usually
lacking from sarcomas. Transmission electron microscopy is also very helpful in
the distinction of these tumor types.
Myxoma, the most common benign tumor, has no distinctive
immunohistochemical features.
1. Burke
AP, Renu V. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Tumors of the Heart and Great Vessels.
3rd series. Fascicle 16. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology;
1996.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Blondeau
P. Primary cardiac tumors: French
studies of 533 cases. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;38 (Suppl 2):192-195.
Burke AP,
Rosado-de-Christenson M, Templeton PA, Virmani R. Cardiac fibroma:
Clinico-pathologic correlates and surgical treatment. J Cardiovasc Surg.
1994;108:862-870.
Burke
AP, Cowan D, Virmani R. Primary sarcomas of the heart. Cancer. 1992;69:387-395.
Burke
AP, Virmani R. Osteosarcomas of the heart. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:289-295.
Dein JR,
Frist WH, Stinson EB, et al. Primary cardiac neoplasms: Early and late studies of surgical treatment
in 42 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;93:502-511.
Melo J,
Ahmad A, Chapman R, Wood J, Starr A. Primary tumors of the heart: A rewarding
challenge. Am Surg. 1979;45:681-683.
Miralles
A, Bracamonte L, Soncul H, et al. Cardiac tumors: Clinical experience and
surgical results in 74 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:886-895.
Murphy
MC, Sweeny MS, Putnam JB Jr, et al. Surgical treatment of cardiac tumors: A
25-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:612-617.
Reece
IJ, Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Hallman GL, Powers PL, Montero CG. Cardiac tumors:
Clinical spectrum and prognosis of lesions other than classical benign myxoma
in 20 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;88:439-446.
Ryan RE
Jr, Obeid AI, Parker FB Jr. Primary cardiac valve tumors. J Heart Valve Dis.
1995;4:222-226.
Tazelaar
HD, Locke TJ, McGregor CG. Pathology of surgically excised primary cardiac
tumors. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67:957-965.
Turner
A, Batrick N. Primary cardiac sarcomas: A report of three cases and a review of
the current literature. Int J Cardiol. 1993;40:115-119.
Verkkala
K, Kupari M, Maamies T, et al. Primary cardiac tumorsOperative treatment of 20
patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1989;37:361-364.
Author:
Elizabeth H. Hammond, MD
DRAFT ©1998. College of American Pathologists (CAP).
All rights reserved. None of the contents of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without
prior written permission of the publisher.
Expires as CAP policy in May 2001. A year prior, the
protocol will be reviewed and updated.
Contributors: back Top Main Page
CAP Cancer Committee; Robert L. Yowell, MD, PhD; Robert L. Flinner, MD; Donald
B. Doty, MD