Protocol applies to all carcinomas of renal tubular
origin.
It excludes Wilm’s tumors and tumors of urothelial
origin.
Procedures
• Cytology
This protocol is intended to assist pathologists in
providing clinically useful and relevant information as a result of the
examination of surgical specimens. Use of this protocol is intended to be
entirely voluntary. If equally valid protocols or similar documents are
applicable, the pathologist is, of course, free to follow those authorities.
Indeed, the ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure
must be made by the physician in light of the individual circumstances
presented by a specific patient or specimen.
It should be understood that adherence to this
protocol will not guarantee a successful result. Nevertheless, pathologists are
urged to familiarize themselves with the document. Where a physician chooses to
deviate from the protocol based on the circumstances of a particular patient or
specimen, the physician is advised to make a contemporaneous written notation
of the reason for the procedure followed.
The College recognizes that this document may be
used by hospitals, attorneys, managed care organizations, insurance carriers,
and other payers. However, the document was developed solely as a tool to
assist pathologists in the diagnostic process by providing information that
reflects the state of relevant medical knowledge at the time the protocol was
first published. It was not developed for credentialing, litigation, or
reimbursement purposes. The College cautions that any uses of the protocol for
these purposes involve considerations that are beyond the scope of this document.
I. Cytologic material back Top Main Page
A. Clinical Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses and
treatment, family history of renal tumors)
b. Relevant findings (e.g. imaging studies)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure (e.g. FNA)
e. Anatomic site(s) of specimen (e.g. kidney,
metastatic site)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
b. Number of slides received
c. Quantity and appearance of fluid specimen
d. Other materials received
e. Results of intraprocedural consultation
2. Material submitted for microscopic
examination (e.g. smear, cytocentrifuge, touch or filter preparation, cell
block)
3. Special studies (specify) (e.g.
histochem-istry, immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic analysis)
C. Microscopic Evaluation
1. Adequacy of specimen (if unsatisfactory for
evaluation, specify reason)
2. Tumor, if present
a. Histologic type if possible (Note
A)
b. Other features (e.g. grade/necrosis)
3. Other pathologic findings
4. Results/status of special studies (specify)
5. Comments
a. Correlation with intraprocedural
consultation, as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
II. Incisional Biopsy (needle
or wedge) back
Top Main
Page
A. Clinical Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses and
treatment, family history of renal tumors)
b. Relevant findings (e.g. imaging studies)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure (e.g. needle biopsy)
e. Anatomic site(s) of specimen (e.g. left
kidney)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Unfixed/fixed
(specify fixative)
b. Number of pieces
c. Dimensions
d. Descriptive features
e. Orientation (if designated by surgeon)
f. Results of intraoperative consultation
2. Tissue submitted for microscopic evaluation,
as appropriate
a. Entire specimen
b. Selected sample
c. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless
saved for special studies)
3. Special studies (specify) (e.g.
histochem-istry, immunohistochemistry, morphometry, DNA analysis [specify
type], cytogenetic analysis)
C. Microscopic Evaluation
1. Tumor
a. Histologic type (if possible) (Note
A)
b. Histologic grade (Note B)
c. Blood/lymphatic vessel invasion (if possible
to determine)
d. Extracapsular extension (if possible to
determine)
2. Additional pathologic findings, if present
3. Result/status of special studies (specify)
4. Comments
a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation,
as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as
appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
III. Partial Nephrectomy back Top Main Page
A. Clinical Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses and
treatment, family history of renal tumors)
b. Relevant findings (e.g. imaging studies)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure (Note C)
e. Operative findings
f. Anatomic site(s) of specimen (e.g. left
partial kidney, upper pole)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Organs/tissues included
b. Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
c. Type of specimen (Note C)
d. Kidney size — three dimensions
e. Weight (kidney and tumor(s) with perirenal
fat removed)
f. Orientation (if indicated by surgeon)
g. Weight of adrenal gland, if present
h. Presence or absence of:
(1) renal capsule
(2) perirenal fat
i. Other organs/tissue(s) (weigh or measure, as
appropriate)
j. Results of intraoperative consultation
2. Tumor(s)
a. Number
b. Location
c. Size(s) (Note D)
d. Descriptive characteristics (e.g.
solid/cystic, color, consistency, necrosis)
e. Extent of invasion (Note D)
f. Lymph/vascular vessel invasion
3. Margins
a. Renal capsule
b. Renal vessels
c. Ureter
d. Cut surface of kidney, if heminephrectomy
4. Regional lymph nodes (Notes D
and E)
a. Number
b. Location (if possible) (Note E)
5. Tissues submitted for microscopic evaluation
a. Tumor (one section for each cm of tumor
diameter and/or different gross appearances)
b. Non-neoplastic kidney (one section minimum)
c. Sections to document tumor extent
(1) calices, renal pelvis
(2) perirenal tissue (including hilus)
(3) blood vessels
d. All lymph nodes
e. Margins (all)
f. Adrenal gland (one section minimum)
g. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless
saved for special studies)
h. Other tissue(s) (as appropriate)
6. Special studies (specify) (e.g. histochemistry,
immunohistochemistry, morphometry, DNA analysis [specify type], cytogenetic analysis)
C. Microscopic Evaluation
1. Tumor
a. Histologic type (Note A)
b. Histologic grade (Note B)
c. Extent of invasion (Note D)
d. Blood/lymphatic vessel invasion (Note
D)
2. Margins
a. Renal capsule
b. Renal vessels
c. Ureter
d. Cut surface of kidney, if heminephrectomy
3. Regional lymph nodes
a. Number
b. Number with metastasis* (Note D)
(specify location if possible)
*Measure
largest involved node
4. Metastasis to other organ(s) or structure(s)
(specify site)
5. Additional pathologic findings, if present
6. Other tissue(s)/organ(s) (e.g. adrenal)
7. Results/status of special studies (specify)
8. Comments
a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation,
as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as
appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
IV. Radical Nephrectomy back Top Main Page
A. Clinical Information
1. Patient identification
a. Name
b. Identification number
c. Age (birth date)
d. Gender
2. Responsible physician(s)
3. Date of procedure
4. Other clinical information
a. Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses and
treatment, family history of renal tumors)
b. Relevant findings (e.g. imaging studies)
c. Clinical diagnosis
d. Procedure (e.g. radical nephrectomy, with adrenalectomy,
vena cava thrombectomy and lympadenectomy) (Note F)
e. Operative findings
f. Anatomic site(s) of specimen (e.g. left
kidney)
B. Macroscopic Examination
1. Specimen
a. Organ(s)/tissue(s) included (Note
F)
b. Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
c. Description of perirenal fat/Gerota’s fascia
d. Weight of adrenal gland, if present
e. Kidney size (three dimensions)
f. Weight (kidney and tumor(s) with perirenal
fat removed)
g. Length
of ureter
h. Other submitted tissues and weigh or measure
as appropriate (e.g. venous tumor thrombus, specimens from other organs, etc.)
i. Results of intraoperative consultation
2. Tumor(s)
a. Number
b. Location
c. Size(s) (Note D)
d. Descriptive characteristics (e.g.
solid/cystic, color, consistency, necrosis)
e. Extent of invasion (Note D)
f. Hilar invasion
g. Renal vein invasion
3. Margins
a. Gerota’s fascia
b. Renal
vessels
c. Ureter
4. Regional lymph nodes (Notes D
and E)
a. Number
b. Location (if possible)
5. Separately submitted tissues (specify)
6. Tissue submitted for microscopic evaluation
a. Tumor (one section for each cm of tumor
diameter and/or different gross appearances)
b. Uninvolved kidney (one section minimum)
c. Sections to document tumor extent
(1) calices, renal pelvis
(2) ureter
(3) perirenal tissues (including hilus and
Gerota’s fascia)
(4) renal vessels (includes separately submitted
tumor thrombus)
d. All lymph nodes
e. Margins (as appropriate)
f. Adrenal gland (one section minimum)
g. Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless
saved for special studies)
h. Other tissue(s), as appropriate
7. Special studies (specify)
C. MicroscopIc Evaluation
1. Tumor
a. Histologic type (Note A)
b. Histologic grade (Note B)
c. Extent of invasion (Note D)
d. Blood/lymphatic vessel invasion
2. Margins
a. Gerota’s fascia
b. Renal vessels
c. Ureter
d. Other(s) (as appropriate)
3. Regional lymph nodes
a. Number (Note D)
b. Number with metastasis* (specify location if
possible) (Note D)
*Measure
largest involved node
4. Metastasis to other organs(s) or structure(s)
(specify site)
5. Additional pathologic findings, if present
6. Other tissue(s)/organs
7. Results/status of special studies (specify)
8. Comments
a. Correlation with intraoperative consultation,
as appropriate
b. Correlation with other specimens, as
appropriate
c. Correlation with clinical information, as
appropriate
EXPLANATORY NOTES
A. Histologic
Type back Top Main Page
The histopathologic classification most recently
published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the
International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended and shown below.(1-2)
However, the protocol does not preclude the use of other published
classifications(3-10) which appear in the Atlas of Tumor Pathology,
3rd series, Fascicle 11, Tumors of the Kidney, Bladder and Related Urinary
Structures is also shown below.(3)
AJCC/UICC Histologic
Classification of Renal Carcinoma(1-2)
• Conventional
(clear cell) renal carcinoma
• Papillary
renal carcinoma
• Chromophobe
renal carcinoma
• Collecting
duct carcinoma
• Renal
cell carcinoma, unclassified
AFIP Histologic
Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma(3)
• Clear
cell (hypernephroid) renal cell carcinoma
• Granular
renal cell carcinoma*
• Papillary
renal cell carcinoma
• Chromophobe
renal cell carcinoma
• Collecting
duct type renal cell carcinoma
• Sarcomatoid
renal cell carcinoma*
• Mixed
type renal cell carcinoma
• Renal
cell carcinoma, undifferentiated
* These histologic types of renal cell carcinoma are
not included in the AJCC/UICC classification shown above because it is argued
that they may not represent unique forms of differentiation. Abundant granular
cytoplasm may occur in any of the following tumor types: oncocytoma,
chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, collecting
duct carcinoma and epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Sarcomatoid morphology may be
manifested by any renal cell carcinoma (conventional, papillary, chromophobe,
or collecting duct subtypes) as well as urethelial carcinoma of the renal
pelvis and may represent a progression in tumor grade.
B. Histologic
Grade back Top Main Page
The grading scheme for renal cell carcinoma of
Fuhrman, et al. is recommended and shown below.(11) However, the protocol does not preclude the
use of other grading schemes.(12-16) The system of grading should be
specified in the report.
Grade X Cannot
be assessed
Grade 1 Nuclei
round, uniform, approximately 10 µm in diameter; nucleoli inconspicuous or
absent
Grade 2 Nuclei
slightly irregular, approximately 15 µm in diameter; nucleoli evident
Grade 3 Nuclei
very irregular, approximately 20 µm in diameter; nucleoli large and prominent
Grade 4 Nuclei bizarre and multilobated, 20
µm or greater in diameter, nucleoli
prominent, chromatin clumped.
C. Operative
Procedures back Top Main Page
A partial nephrectomy may vary from a simple
enucleation of the tumor to a partial nephrectomy including variable portions
of the calyceal or renal pelvic collecting system. The perirenal fat
immediately overlying the resected portion of kidney but not to the level of
Gerota’s fascia is usually included.
D. TNM and Stage Groupings back Top Main Page
The TNM
Staging System for renal cell of the AJCC/UICC is recommended and shown below.
(17)
By
AJCC/UICC convention, the designation “T” refers to a primary tumor that has
not been previously treated. The symbol “p” refers to the pathologic classification
of the TNM, as opposed to the clinical classification and is based on gross and
microscopic examination. pT entails a
resection of the primary tumor or biopsy adequate to evaluate the highest pT
category; pN entails removal of nodes adequate to validate lymph node
metastasis; and pM implies microscopic examination of distant lesions. Clinical classification (cTNM) is usually
carried out by the referring physician before treatment during initial evaluation
of the patient or when pathologic classification is not possible.
Residual Tumor in the Patient
Tumor
remaining in a patient after therapy with curative intent (e.g., surgical
resection for cure) is categorized by a system known as R classification, shown
below.
RX Presence of residual tumor cannot be
assessed
R0 No residual tumor
R1 Microscopic residual tumor
R2 Macroscopic residual tumor.
For the
surgeon, the R classification may be useful to indicate the known or assumed
status of the completeness of a surgical excision. For the pathologist, the R classification is relevant to the
status of the margins of a surgical resection specimen. That is, tumor involving the resection
margin on pathologic examination may be assumed to correspond to residual tumor
in the patient and may be classified as macroscopic or microscopic according to
the findings at the specimen margin(s).
Residual Tumor in a Specimen
In
contrast, tumor remaining in a resection specimen from a patient who has
undergone previous (neoadjuvant) treatment of any type (radiation therapy
alone, chemotherapy therapy alone, or any combined modality treatment) is
codified by the TNM using a prescript “y” (e.g., ypT1). Thus, yTNM indicates the post-treatment
status of the tumor. For many
neoadjuvant therapies, the classification of residual disease may be a strong
predictor of postoperative outcome. In
addition, the ypTNM classification provides a standardized framework for the
collection of data needed to accurately evaluate new neoadjuvant therapies.
Locally Recurrent Tumor
In
contrast to “residual” tumor, classification of a tumor as “recurrent” requires
a documented disease-free interval after definitive therapy. Recurrent tumor may also be classified
according to the TNM categories, but the prefix “r” (e.g., rpT1) is used to
indicate the recurrent status of the tumor.
Primary Tumor (T)
TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumor
T1 Tumor 7.0 cm or less in greatest
dimension limited to the kidney
T2 Tumor more than 7.0 cm in greatest dimension
limited to the kidney
T3 Tumor extends into major veins or
invades the adrenal gland or perinephric tissues but not beyond Gerota’s fascia
T3a Tumor
invades the adrenal gland* or perinephric tissues but not beyond Gerota’s
fascia
T3b Tumor
grossly extends into the renal vein(s) or vena cava below the diaphragm
T3c Tumor
grossly extends into the vena cava above the diaphragm
T4 Tumor invades beyond Gerota’s fascia.
*Direct invasion
of the adrenal gland, which is categorized as local extension, must be
differentiated from metastatic tumor in the adrenal which is categorized M1
(see below for Distant Metastasis).
Regional Lymph Nodes (N) † (see Note E
below)
NX Regional lymph nodes cannot be
assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis in a single lymph node
N2 Metastasis in more than one regional
lymph node
†Note: Laterality does not affect the N
classification.
Distant Metastasis (M)
MX Distant metastasis cannot be
assessed
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
Stage Groupings
Stage I T1 N0 M0
Stage II T2 N0 M0
Stage
III T1 N1 M0
T2 N1 M0
T3 N0, N1 M0
Stage IV T4 N0,
N1 M0
Any T N2 M0
Any T Any N M1
E. Lymph Nodes back
Top Main
Page
Regional lymphadenectomy is not generally performed
even with a radical nephrectomy. A few lymph nodes may be found in a
nephrectomy specimen in the renal hilus around the major renal vessels. Other
regional lymph nodes, paracaval, para-aortic and retroperitoneal, may be
submitted separately.
F. Radical
Nephrectomy back Top Main Page
A standard radical nephrectomy specimen consists of
the entire kidney, including the calyces, pelvis and a variable length of ureter.
The adrenal gland is usually removed en bloc with the kidney. The entire
perirenal fatty tissue is removed to the level of Gerota’s fascia, a membranous
structure, similar to the consistency of the renal capsule, which encases the
kidney and perirenal fat. Variable lengths of the major renal vessels, at the
hilus are submitted. Some lymph nodes
may be present in the renal hilus.
1. Störkel
S, Eble JN, Adlakha K, et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma. Workgroup
No. 1. Cancer. 1997;80:987-989.
2. Amtrup
F, Hausen JB, Thybo E. Prognosis in renal cell carcinoma evaluated from histological
criteria. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1974;8:198-202.
3. Murphy
WM, Beckwith JB, Farrow GM. Tumors of the adult kidney. In: Tumors of the
Kidney, Bladder and Related Structure.
Atlas of Tumor Pathology. 3rd series. Fascicle 11. Washington, DC: Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology; 1994: 98-124.
4. Angervall
L, Carlström E, Wahlqvist L, Ahren C. Effects of clinical and morphologic
variables on spread of renal cell carcinoma in an operative series. Scand J
Urol Nephrol. 1969;3:134-140.
5. Bennington
JL. Tumors of the kidney. In: Javadpour N, Barsky SH, eds. Surgical Pathology
of Urologic Diseases. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1987:120-122.
6. Fleming
S. The impact of genetics on the classification of renal carcinoma.
Histopathology. 1993;22:89-92.
7. Kovacs
G. Molecular differential pathology of renal cell tumours. Histopathology.
1993;22:1-8.
8. Mathisen
W, Muri O, Myhre E. Pathology and prognosis in renal tumors. Acta Chir Scand.
1965;130:303-313.
9. Petkovic
SD. An anatomical classification of renal tumors in the adult as a basis for
prognosis. J Urol. 1959;81:618-623.
10. Thoenes
W, Storkel S, Rumpelt HJ. Histopathology and classification of renal cell
tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). Pathol Res Pract.
1989;181:125-143.
11. Fuhrman
SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in
renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655-663.
12. Arner O,
Blanck C, van Schreeb T. Renal adenocarcinoma: Morphology grading of
malignancy, prognosis. A study of 197 cases. Acta Chir Scand. 1965;346
(Suppl):1-51.
13. Hermanek
P, Sigel A, Chlepas S. Histological grading of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol.
1976; 2:189-191.
14. Siminovitch
JM, Montie JE, Straffon RA. Prognostic indicators in renal adenocarcinoma. J
Urol. 1983;130:20-23.
15. Skinner
DG, Colvin RB, Vermillion DC, Pfester RC, Leadbetter WF. Diagnosis and
management of renal cell carcinoma: A
clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases. Cancer. 1971; 28:1165-1177.
16. Syrjänen
K, Hjelt L. Grading of human renal adenocarcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1978;
12:49-55.
17. Fleming
ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. eds. AJCC Manual for Staging of Cancer. 5th
ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven;1997.
Authors:
George Farrow, MD and Mahul B. Amin, MD
©2000. College of American Pathologists (CAP). All
rights reserved. None of the contents of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means
(electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without prior
written permission of the publisher.
Expires as CAP policy in May 2001. A year prior, the
protocol will be reviewed and updated.
Contributors: back Top Main Page
CAP Cancer Committee